California Sues Amazon to Force It to Provide Data of Compliance with COVID-19 Restrictions



On Monday Xavier Becerra, Attorney General for the state of  California asked the court to force Amazon to give information concerning his investigations on the proper compliance of the e-commerce giant with COVID-19 restrictions applied by the state.

Although the Democratic Attorney General had asked for information in May, Amazon failed to provide information.

 “It has been nearly six months since the attorney general’s initial request to Amazon for information regarding its COVID-19-related data, policies, practices, and procedures for its California facilities and workers. The slow drip of information from Amazon is an insufficient response,” the lawsuit reads. “Absent the requested data, the attorney general is unable to adequately determine if Amazon is complying with applicable California law.”

 Becerra said that he had learnt more about Amazon’s practices from press releases and media reports rather than from the company itself.

 “Amazon has made billions during this pandemic relying on the labor of essential workers,” Becerra said in a statement. “It is critical to know if these workers are receiving the protections on the job that they are entitled to under the law.” “Time is of the essence,” he said.

 In October Amazon said that almost 20,000 of its workers contacted coronavirus between March and mid-September. The company has received criticism from advocacy groups as well as its workers about its treatment of workers and benefits offered to them. Warehouses offer “unique and potentially dangerous conditions” to work in, especially during the pandemic.




Follow us on Google news for more updates and News

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. is not registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Rather, relies upon the “publisher’s exclusion” from the definition of investment adviser as provided under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws.

Full Disclaimer