Post a Free Blog

Submit A Press Release

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Action
Animation
ATP Tour (ATP)
Auto Racing
Baseball
Basketball
Boxing
Breaking News
Business
Business
Business Newsletter
Call of Duty (CALLOFDUTY)
Canadian Football League (CFL)
Car
Celebrity
Champions Tour (CHAMP)
Comedy
CONCACAF
Counter Strike Global Offensive (CSGO)
Crime
Defense of the Ancients (DOTA)
Documentary and Foreign
Drama
eSports
European Tour (EPGA)
Fashion
FIFA
FIFA Women’s World Cup (WWC)
FIFA World Cup (FIFA)
Fighting
Football
Formula 1 (F1)
Fortnite
Golf
Health
Hockey
Horror
IndyCar Series (INDY)
International Friendly (FRIENDLY)
Kids & Family
League of Legends (LOL)
LPGA
Madden
Major League Baseball (MLB)
Mixed Martial Arts (MMA)
MLS
Movie and Music
Movie Trailers
Mystery
NASCAR Cup Series (NAS)
National Basketball Association (NBA)
National Football League (NFL)
National Hockey League (NHL)
National Women's Soccer (NWSL)
NBA Development League (NBAGL)
NBA2K
NCAA Baseball (NCAABBL)
NCAA Basketball (NCAAB)
NCAA Football (NCAAF)
NCAA Hockey (NCAAH)
Olympic Mens (OLYHKYM)
Other
Other Sports
Overwatch
PGA
Politics
Premier League (PREM)
Romance
Sci-Fi
Science
Soccer
Sports
Sports
Technology
Tennis
Truck Series (TRUCK)
Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)
Uncategorized
US
Valorant
Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA)
Women’s NCAA Basketball (WNCAAB)
World
World Cup Qualifier (WORLDCUP)
WTA Tour (WTA)
Xfinity (XFT)
XFL
0
-- Advertisement --spot_img
HomeBusinessJudge rules Epic Game Couldn't Prove Apple’s a Monopolist, Orders Apple To...

Judge rules Epic Game Couldn’t Prove Apple’s a Monopolist, Orders Apple To Include External Links In App Store

Add to Favorite
Added to Favorite

 

 

On Friday, a federal judge in California ruled that Epic Games was unable to prove that Cupertino tech giant Apple was a monopolist. However, she left the ruling open so that others might help prove it in future. Epic Games, however, won on another issue, of anticompetitive conduct and Apple is required to make the necessary changes in its business model.

 

In her judgement, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers wrote that although the court noted that Apple had a considerable market share of more than 55 percent and had extraordinarily high margins of profit, these factors were insufficient to show antitrust conduct as “success” was “not illegal.”

 

She also said that the final trial record failed to include evidence of other critical factors including “barriers to entry and conduct decreasing output or decreasing innovation in the relevant market.” She said that the Court did not find it impossible but only noted that Epic Games was unable to show that “Apple is an illegal monopolist.”

 

With her ruling, the judge has left open possibilities for appeal or for other lawsuits to take it forward. The Department of Justice has brought a similar suit against Google on its App Store practices. POLITICO had reported that the Department of Justice had been waiting for the judgement on Epic Games’ suit before proceeding against big tech.

 

Judge Rogers said that Apple exhibited anticompetitive conduct by not allowing developers to inform customers directly about their own payment mechanisms that they could use instead of payment through Apple. She ordered the tech company to let developers include external links to their own tools as well as to the purchasing mechanism available in the App Store.

 

This part of the ruling is a partial victory for Epic Games and other developers as it will force Apple to change its business model. This ruling will help Epic Games as well as other developers who offer their apps in Apple’s App Store to offer their own payment processing services and Apple’s App Store will no longer be the only way for customers to purchase apps.

 

Apple has been slowly adjusting policies that have the potential of becoming lawsuits in future. These new policies will make it difficult for regulators or rivals relying on their services to pursue legal action in future.

Image-

Subscribe to get Latest News Updates

Latest News

You may like more
more

Johnson & Johnson Q1 Earnings Preview: Analyst Expectations and Strategic Insights

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ:NYSE) Quarterly Earnings Preview On Tuesday, April...

Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) Beats Q1 2024 Earnings and Revenue Forecasts

Bank7 Corp. (BSVN:NASDAQ) Surpasses Earnings and Revenue Forecasts On Friday,...

Goldman Sachs Analyst Sets $72 Price Target on Charles Schwab Corporation

Alexander Blostein's Price Target on Charles Schwab Corporation Alexander Blostein...

Wedbush Upgrades PVH to Outperform Amid Stock Volatility

Wedbush Upgrades PVH:NYSE to Outperform On Monday, April 15, 2024,...