No China participation for WHO second study on COVID-19 origin

On Thursday, a top Chinese health official Zeng Yixin said that its government will not be a part of the second phase of a World Health Organization (WHO) study on the origins of COVID-19. The Chinese government refused to cooperate with the second phase of investigations after the proposal included studying the possibility that the virus might have leaked from a Wuhan laboratory.


Zeng Yixin, deputy head of China’s National Health Commission, addressed a press conference in Beijing and said that he had been “surprised” to see the lab leak was a research objective in the second phase of the investigation and said that it was impossible for them to accept such a plan.


In March, the WHO released an initial report on the origins of the coronavirus. It said that the virus most probably originated from an animal and then spread to humans sometime in December 2019. However, many world leaders including those of the G7, said that the report was not thorough.


Around the same time Peter Ben Embarek, one of the team members of the study had said at a news briefing that the lab leak theory had not received “the same depth of attention and work” as other hypotheses that were initially proposed.


On July 15, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyseus has asked China to co-operate with the new investigations on the origins of COVID-19 mentioning that the earlier investigation had faced obstacles including a lack of data on the early days of the pandemic.


He said that they asked China to be transparent and open and to cooperate with the WHO team, at a news conference. He also said that they owed it to the millions who suffered and to the millions who died that they should know the origin of the coronavirus pandemic.


On July 16, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zao Lijian said that the Chinese government had totally cooperated with the initial investigation and had provided access to locations and data. However, experts and scientists outside China have refuted these claims.



Author Thorkild Tylleskar

Follow us on Google news for more updates and News


This content is being provided to you for informational purposes only. The content has been prepared by third parties not affiliated with CWEB Inc, a business. This content and any information contained therein, does not constitute a recommendation by CWEB to buy, sell or hold any security, financial product or instrument referenced in the content. This information neither is, nor should be construed as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell securities by CWEB Inc. CWEB Inc. does not offer or provide any opinion regarding the nature, potential, value, suitability or profitability of any particular investment or investment strategy, and you shall be fully responsible for any investment decisions you make, and such decisions will be based solely on your evaluation of your financial circumstances, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and liquidity needs.

Unless stated otherwise, the web content provided by the CWEB family of companies is for educational purposes only. The information and tools provided neither are, nor should be construed, as an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell securities by CWEB Inc. or its affiliates. Unless stated otherwise, no information presented constitutes a recommendation by CWEB Inc. or its affiliates to buy, sell or hold any security, financial product or instrument discussed therein or to engage in any specific investment strategy.

Full Disclaimer