Georgia Senate battles: 50-50 split seems likely

Like & Share us on Facebook.



Georgia reported a turnout of 168,000 on Day 1 of its Senate run-off voting for Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossnoff of the Democratic Party and Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue from the Republicans side.

Reports say that additionally 314,000 people have hit the absentee ballots in this period of early voting.

These elections will add clarity on Georgia’s Chamber of Congress along with the destiny of President Biden’s governance agenda.

The turnout of the first day of early in-person election set a record, abrogating its earlier one of October as the early in-person election commenced for the general election in 2020. The voting numbers have seen a steady rise since the commencement of the ballot roll out.

Reports released by the Georgia Votes data say that over 1.1 million people voted in the Georgia runoffs for Jan. 5.

According to statistics from The U.S. Elections Project, those 24,000 who missed voting in the November election have also reached the runoff booths to cast their ballots.

The Jan. 5 runoff election is for choosing the party that will control America’s Senate. Currently, the Republicans have 50 out of 48 seats in the chamber. If Georgia makes the Democratic pair win in the runoffs, the Democrats will stand even with the Republicans in a 50-50 split. The tie will then be broken when Kamala Harris, the Vice President-elect casts her vote.

Millions of dollars are pouring into Georgia as the Republicans and Democrats are splurging.  Reports say that the Democrats need to win at the twin contests to prevent Republicans from forming a majority, as they may use it to have a significant say in Biden’s official nominees and legislative endeavours.

Biden and Trump have contributed their respective share of campaigning in Georgia as well.



Follow us on Google news for more updates and News

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. is not registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Rather, relies upon the “publisher’s exclusion” from the definition of investment adviser as provided under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws.

Full Disclaimer